Back

Designing urban green-space heterogeneity across urbanisation gradients to maintain avian richness

Hu, J.; van Os, D.; Morpurgo, J.; Veldhuis, M. P.; Remme, R. P.; de Snoo, G. R.; Si, Y.

2026-02-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.12.705555 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urban expansion drives land cover change and habitat simplification, contributing to biodiversity loss. Urban green spaces can mitigate these impacts, but their effectiveness depends on its configuration and implementation. Here, we examine how three complementary dimensions of environmental heterogeneity--plant species richness, habitat heterogeneity, and foliage-layer richness--shape bird richness along an urbanisation gradient in the Netherlands. Using bird and plant occurrence data, LiDAR-derived vegetation structure, and land-use data, we fitted generalized additive models at three spatial scales (100, 200, and 300 m) to assess how these relationships vary across the urbanisation gradient. Plant species richness showed the strongest and consistent positive effect on bird richness, disregarding urbanization intensities. Habitat heterogeneity showed most pronounced positive effects at intermediate levels of urbanisation. In contrast, foliage-layer richness had weak associations with bird richness across urbanization intensities. Together, these results demonstrate that sustaining urban bird diversity requires urbanisation-intensity-dependent design of green-space heterogeneity. Increasing plant richness is generally recommended across urbanization intensities. Increasing habitat heterogeneity is more effective at intermediate levels of urbanisation and appears less suitable in highly urbanised contexts. Beyond simply expanding green space area or their spatial complexity alone, urban planning should focus on the thoughtful design of different types of environmental heterogeneity. This includes city-wide species-rich planting and structurally diverse habitat mosaics in mid-density areas to sustain urban bird diversity.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
12
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
13
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
15
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%