Back

eDNA metabarcoding provides scalable and continuous biodiversity monitoring across the tree of life

Macher, T.-H.; Schuetz, R.; Arle, J.; Beermann, A.; Haase, P.; Koschorrek, J.; Krehenwinkel, H.; Mora, D.; Sinclair, J. S.; Zimmermann, J.; Leese, F.

2026-02-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.12.705487 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has the potential to substantially expand our knowledge of global biodiversity beyond that provided by conventional approaches. However, the degree to which eDNA data provides real ecological insight, rather than primarily reflecting environmental factors that affect eDNA shedding and degradation, remains unclear. Additional uncertainties arise in terms of cost-effectiveness and whether the price is worth any extra biodiversity information that is gleaned. Here, we established a high-resolution, bi-weekly eDNA time-series in Germany across aquatic and riparian habitats to quantify seasonal biodiversity dynamics, to relate eDNA to different potential environmental drivers, and to parametrize cost estimates. Over one year, eDNA metabarcoding detected more than 1,000 species across multiple trophic levels and primarily revealed real, taxon-specific seasonal patterns, in addition to some relationships to water temperature, discharge, and conductivity. Compared to historical records dating back to 1891, year-round eDNA monitoring increased reported species numbers by 2.4-fold for invertebrates, 2.2-fold for mammals, 1.7-fold for diatoms, 1.2-fold for fish and lamprey, and 1.03-fold for birds. Cumulative biodiversity estimates increased strongly with sampling frequency, demonstrating the value of eDNA for high-frequency time-series monitoring. Moreover, eDNA monitoring was highly cost-effective, providing more than twice the biodiversity information of many conventional surveys for one-sixth the cost, enabling scalable, high-resolution freshwater biodiversity assessments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
34.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
17
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.5%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%