Back

Upregulation of Genetic Markers of Poor Prognosis following Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells

Taylor, A.; Strasser, M. K.; Ng, M.; Rubin, I.; Kaipainen, A.; Pisco, A. O.; Huang, S.

2026-02-15 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.12.705420 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chemoresistance, a leading cause of treatment failure in cancer, is commonly explained by Darwinian selection of treatment-resistant cell clones. However, recurring resistant tumors invariably display complex phenotypes that contribute to increased malignancy, unlikely to have been selected for by chemotherapy. The growing awareness of (non - genetic) phenotypic plasticity led to the hypothesis that chemotherapy, while reducing tumor burden, also inflicts cell stress that induces stem-like states in cells that survive treatment. Here we examined the transcriptomes of HL-60 leukemic cancer cells that survived exposure to three commonly used drugs at submaximal doses for two to four days, and compared differentially expressed genes to those associated with prognosis in public transcriptome databases of acute myeloid leukemia cohorts. While among the genes differentially upregulated in surviving cells, some reflect the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy as they were associated with favorable outcomes in cohort data, many genes upregulated were associated with poor survival, notably genes involved in stemness, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), inflammation, drug resistance, and apoptosis evasion. These findings support the idea that treatment effectiveness is the net result of an intrinsic tradeoff: Cytocidal treatment, intended to quantitatively reduce cancer cells, also qualitatively increases the malignancy of non-killed cells, which could contribute to residual disease and relapse. This result has implications for drug screening of new therapeutics, as well as in vitro profiling of patient-derived tumor cell susceptibility to existing drugs, which only assess suppression of cancer cell growth and survival. Statement of SignificanceCells surviving chemotherapy upregulate many genes that may affect prognosis. Therefore, drug screening must embrace a more holistic assessment of the biological quality of cell response beyond the rate of cell killing.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.1%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
3
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
5
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
7
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
23
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%