Visual experience drives functional reorganization of cortical GABAergic circuits
Sun, S.; Yue, Y.; Li, Z.; Perrenoud, Q.; Cardin, J. A.
Show abstract
Sensory deprivation leads to extensive cortical plasticity, but the impact of enhanced sensory experience on the mature cortex remains poorly understood. Here, we examine how visually evoked activity in cortical circuits is shaped by repeated exposure to varied stimuli. The most prominent pattern of visually evoked activity in mouse primary visual cortex, beta oscillations (15-30Hz), arises from brief events of neural synchrony with a characteristic pattern of laminar propagation and relies on the activity of somatostatin-expressing (SST) GABAergic interneurons. We find that visually evoked beta activity is initially weak but robustly potentiated by repeated exposure to a diverse visual stimulus set, leading to enhanced recruitment of cortical neurons by these rhythmic network events. Cellular imaging further reveals that visual experience leads to increased visual responses in SST interneurons and suppressed responses in vasoactive intestinal peptide-expressing (VIP) GABAergic interneurons. In association with this rebalancing of inhibitory circuits, visual experience enhances visual selectivity in nearby pyramidal neurons. Visual experience thus selectively reorganizes adult dendrite-targeting inhibitory circuits, promoting network synchrony and enhancing sensory encoding by cortical excitatory projection neurons.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Astrocytic modulation of population encoding in mouse visual cortex via GABA transporter 3 revealed by multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing 98%
- Locus coeruleus spiking differently correlates with somatosensory cortex activity and pupil diameter 97%
- Mega-scale movie-fields in the mouse visuo-hippocampal network 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.