Back

HP1α depletion and TGFβ activation exert antagonistic effects on 3D genome organization

Patalano, F.; Hovet, O.; Rossini, R.; Nekrasov, M.; Dijkwel, Y.; Azad, B.; Soboleva, T.; Aasland, R.; Tremethick, D.; Paulsen, J.

2026-02-13 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.12.705282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) organization of the human genome plays a critical role in regulating gene expression and is frequently disrupted in cancer. However, how key factors like Heterochromatin Protein 1 alpha (HP1) and Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF{beta}) remodel this architecture to drive tumorigenesis remains poorly understood. We investigated the effects of HP1 knockdown and TGF{beta} treatment on higher-order chromatin structure and gene expression in human mammary epithelial cells. Our findings reveal that HP1 depletion and TGF{beta} stimulation exert distinct and opposing effects on genome compartmentalization and sub compartmentalization. HP1 knockdown drives a genome-wide shift of chromatin from transcriptionally inactive B compartments to active A compartments. This is accompanied by a stepwise redistribution of A subcompartments toward the most transcriptionally active state (A3), and the upregulation of oncogenic genes involved in EMT and proliferation. In contrast, TGF{beta} treatment promotes chromatin compaction, increases the proportion of B compartments, and drives a stepwise reduction in active A subcompartments. Our results highlight the differential roles of HP1 and TGF{beta} in shaping the 3D genome and underscore how precise, stepwise architectural changes contribute to malignant transformation. This study provides critical insight into how chromatin architecture acts as a regulatory layer in breast cancer development. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=138 SRC="FIGDIR/small/705282v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c7475org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@121b305org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1704b64org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1659c34_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.9%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.9%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.1%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
5
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
12
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
15
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
23
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%