Back

Quantitative Cerebrovascular Analysis for Improved Prediction of Post-Stroke Complications

Deshpande, A.; Wang, J.; Altaweel, L.; Yi, S.; Bahiru, Z.; Leiphart, T.; Tahsili-Fahadan, P.; Laksari, K.

2026-02-17 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346217 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has transformed the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, a substantial proportion of AIS patients experience poor outcomes despite successful recanalization, often due to severe neurological deterioration or life-threatening complications. Early identification of these high-risk patients remains a major unmet need. In this study, we developed and validated machine-learning (ML) models that integrate automated quantitative cerebrovascular morphology and collateral grading with demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables to predict major post-EVT complications and early neurological outcomes. MethodsUsing a prospectively collected database of 727 AIS patients that underwent EVT, we developed ML models to incorporate patient-specific vascular morphometry with conventional clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to predict emergence of early neurological deterioration (END), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), malignant brain edema (MBE) requiring surgical decompression, and neurogenic respiratory failure and dysphagia requiring tracheostomy/gastrostomy (TC/PEG). ResultsOur analysis of morphological features, including increased tortuosity and reduced vessel diameter, showed strong associations with complications. Morphology-informed (MI) models consistently outperformed baseline-clinical (BC) models for patients with END (AUROC 0.81 for MI model vs. 0.73 for BC), sICH (AUROC 0.68 MI vs. 0.56 BC model), MBE (AUROC 0.67 MI model vs. 0.56 BC), or patients who underwent TC/PEG (AUROC 0.66MI vs. 0.58 BC model). Statistical testing confirmed significant AUROC improvements for END, sICH and mRS (p < 0.05), Finally, patient-specific calibrated probability profiles enabled individualized, multidimensional risk stratification, revealing distinct complication-specific risk patterns across patients. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that cerebrovascular structure--an often overlooked yet physiologically fundamental determinant of ischemic injury and reperfusion dynamics--provides significant predictive information that is not captured by standard clinical or visual imaging assessments. Automated vascular segmentation and collateral grading techniques enable rapid and objective integration of cerebrovascular metrics into prognostic models, offering a scalable tool for precision risk stratification, supporting earlier intervention, targeted monitoring, and improved post-EVT management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%