Novel Representations of Vaccine Protection Against Progression to Severe Disease Over Time
Dean, N.; Zarnitsyna, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaccines can prevent severe disease by preventing infection or by reducing progression among those who become infected. Vaccine effectiveness against progression given infection is often used to quantify this second mechanism, but it conditions on infection, which is itself affected by vaccination. As a result, this estimand lacks a clear causal interpretation and may behave non-intuitively over time. MethodsWe introduce a conceptual framework that models protection against infection and protection against progression as separate components that wane over time. Protection is represented using individual-level threshold-crossing times that depend on covariates and define a time-varying population susceptible to infection. Within this framework, we derive standard vaccine effectiveness estimands and propose two alternative decompositions of protection against severe disease: a progression-risk-weighted multiplicative decomposition and an additive decomposition based on absolute risk reduction. We illustrate their behavior using simulated examples. ResultsThe weighted multiplicative decomposition restores a causal interpretation for progression protection within the doomed principal stratum and avoids negative estimates. The additive decomposition provides a clear representation of the pathways over time. ConclusionsExplicitly modeling the infection-to-severe-disease pathway improves interpretation of vaccine effectiveness under waning immunity.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating targeted COVID-19 vaccination strategies with agent-based modeling 95%
- Epidemiological and health economic implications of symptom propagation in respiratory pathogens: A mathematical modelling investigation 95%
- The interplay between vaccination and social distancing strategies affects COVID19 population-level outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Methods for Estimating the Protective Effects of Immune Markers Using Test-Negative Designs 95%
- Misclassification of yellow fever vaccination status revealed through hierarchical Bayesian modeling 93%
- Potential biases arising from epidemic dynamics in observational seroprotection studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic models of humoral kinetics following COVID-19 vaccination 95%
- Medium-term scenarios of COVID-19 as a function of immune uncertainties and chronic disease 95%
- Vaccination strategies when vaccines are scarce: On conflicts between reducing the burden and avoiding the evolution of escape mutants 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.