Back

Comparative genomics reveals signatures of distinct metabolic strategies and gene loss associated with Hydra immortality

Nojiri, K.; Kin, K.; Someya, A.; Kon, T.; Kon-Nanjo, K.; Shimizu, H.; Arakawa, K.; Susaki, E. A.

2026-02-13 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.11.705429 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hydra is a freshwater cnidarian genus that provides a unique comparative model for aging research, contrasting the immortal H. vulgaris with the aging-inducible H. oligactis. Here, we report a high-quality, chromosome-level genome assembly of H. vulgaris strain AEP.JNIG. Our assembly is comparable in quality to existing resources, facilitating the analysis of genomic diversity across laboratory strains. Epigenomic profiling revealed that gene-body hypermethylation correlates with transcriptional stability and the suppression of spurious transcription in evolutionary conserved genes, suggesting an epigenetic mechanism for genomic integrity. Furthermore, comparative genomics demonstrated that while Hydra conserves fundamental Hallmarks of Aging pathways, the immortal H. vulgaris paradoxically lacks canonical anti-aging genes (e.g., Klotho, NAMPT) found in the aging-inducible H. oligactis. Instead, H. vulgaris exhibits a distinct metabolic signature related to mitochondrial energy production and NTP synthesis. Collectively, our comparative genomics results suggest multiple potential mechanisms associated with the H. vulgaris immortality and the aging traits of H. oligactis, providing novel targets for future functional studies. Significance statementWhy do some organisms age while others appear not to? The freshwater animal Hydra provides a unique opportunity to investigate this question, as closely related species display contrasting aging phenotypes. We generated a high-quality genome assembly for a new strain of a non-aging species and conducted comparative analyses with related strains and an aging species. Even closely related strains can accumulate substantial genetic divergence over time, and stable DNA modification patterns were associated with consistent gene activity, suggesting a mechanism that may help maintain cellular balance. Surprisingly, several well-known longevity genes are present in the aging species but absent in the non-aging one. This suggests that extended lifespan may not simply depend on possessing more "anti-aging" genes, but instead may reflect differences in how core biological processes are organized. Our study provides new insights into the genetic basis of aging and highlights Hydra as a powerful model for understanding longevity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.8%
4
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 8%
6.2%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
14
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
18
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
21
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
24
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%