Back

Voluntary temporal attention improves perception even in the absence of temporal competition

Tian, K. J.; Motzer, J. A.; Denison, R. N.

2026-02-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.11.705419 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When successive stimuli occur close enough together in time, their perception can be impaired. Such impairments indicate temporal competition between successive stimuli for representational resources. Voluntary temporal attention can bias processing resources in favor of a behaviorally relevant moment, improving perception at the attended time at the expense of impairments at unattended times. However it is unclear whether these perceptual tradeoffs across time arise because voluntary temporal attention selects among actively competing stimulus representations, such as within visual working memory, or if instead, temporal attention facilitates stimulus processing prior to a competitive stage. Here we used a temporal cueing task with up to two targets in succession to test whether and how the effects of temporal attention depend on temporal competition. We found that voluntary temporal attention improved performance even in the absence of temporal competition, when only one stimulus appeared during the trial. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional enhancement was comparable with and without competition. These results suggest that voluntary temporal attention enhances perception by facilitating processing prior to a competitive stage, rather than by resolving conflicts between actively competing stimulus representations. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=126 SRC="FIGDIR/small/705419v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1f8dforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10a33f1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d81cfborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@56a432_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
14
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
17
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%