Back

Not-so-great tits: early-life environment drives long-term decrease in adult body mass in a wild bird population

Lopez-Idiaquez, D.; Cole, E. F.; Satarkar, D.; Crofts, S. J.; McMahon, K.; Sheldon, B. C.

2026-02-13 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705378 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Body mass is a key organismal characteristic that impacts many physiological and ecological processes and often a strong determinant of fitness. Recent studies have documented temporal phenotypic changes in this trait in many populations, but identifying the mechanisms underpinning these changes can be difficult. Here, we use 47 years of data to analyse how adult and nestling body mass have changed over time in a great tit Parus major population in Wytham Woods (UK). Further, we link those changes to three environmental variables previously recognised as drivers of body mass: temperature, intra- and inter-specific competition and temporal mismatch with a key prey during breeding, winter moth Operophtera brumata caterpillars. Temporal analyses of adult body mass revealed contrasting dynamics at the between- and within-cohort levels, mirroring Simpsons Paradox. At the population level we report a marked decrease in body mass in adults between 1978 and 2024 (-0.042 Haldanes), and show that this results from phenotypic plasticity, driven by a negative between-cohort trend likely reflecting carry-over effects of the early environment. Within cohorts, however, trends were consistently positive likely reflecting an age-dependent mass increase. The change in adults was paralleled by a change in nestling body mass (-0.036 Haldanes). Nestling mass was negatively associated with estimated intensity of intraspecific competition, as well as inter-specific competition from blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus, as quantified by local population density. These effects carried over to adulthood, as shown by a negative association between adult mass and the population density experienced at early life. Temperature during development and mismatch with the caterpillar food supply, despite being associated with adult and nestling mass, did not explain the observed declines in mass, largely because these have not changed over time. Overall, our results illustrate the potential for effects mediated early in development to carry-over into long-term phenotypic change at later life history stages, and emphasise the value of considering multiple effects as drivers of phenotypic change in natural populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.8%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.1%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
8
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
14
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
15
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
23
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%