Back

Whole-genome sequencing reveals inter-household networks of gut-colonising ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in two rural Malawian districts

O'Ferrall, A. M.; Lally, D.; Makaula, P.; Namacha, G.; Lewis, J. M.; Musicha, P.; Goodman, R. N.; Allman, E.; Moyo, S.; Waddington, C. S.; Kayuni, S. A.; Feasey, N. A.; Musaya, J.; Stothard, J. R.; Roberts, A. P.

2026-02-12 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) is a global health concern that disproportionately affects sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Gut mucosal colonisation is thought to precede invasive infection. Understanding ESBL-Ec colonisation and transmission across communities is therefore essential. We investigated the genomic epidemiology and spatial structure of 159 gut-colonising ESBL-Ec isolates from the faeces of 211 people in two rural Malawian villages using longitudinal sampling (2023-24), whole-genome sequencing and household mapping. Colonisation prevalence rose from 34.1% (95% CI: 27.8-41.0) to 54.2% (95% CI: 46.0-62.3) over one year. Isolates belonged to 33 sequence types (STs), most commonly ST38 and ST131, harbouring 46 distinct antimicrobial resistance gene types. Fifteen strains were identified in [&ge;]3 households that were typically separated by short geographic distances (<400 m). Of 190 pairwise comparisons between same-strain isolates from different households sampled concurrently within villages, 88.9% differed by [&le;]10 single nucleotide polymorphisms, consistent with multi-household involvement in community transmission networks. Lineage-specific ST38 and ST131 network analyses linked rural isolates to urban Malawian isolates collected within the last decade. Our findings provide a transferable framework for inferring ESBL-Ec flow in community settings and highlight the need for One Health surveillance and improved sanitation infrastructure to limit transmission.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.