Back

Screening of purine nucleoside analogues against intracellular Toxoplasma gondii.

Elati, H. A.; Van Calenbergh, S.; Sheiner, L.; De Koning, H. P.

2026-02-12 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Toxoplasmosis remains a world-wide public health concern, especially for the immunocompromised. Although this population segment is increasing due to therapeutic interventions, organ transplants and infections including HIV, treatment relies almost exclusively on sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine, antifolates developed against malaria but with only moderate efficacy against acute toxoplasmosis and no effect on the chronic stage. Here we explore whether 7-substituted analogues of 7-deazaadenosine (tubercidin) that have shown remarkable efficacy against other protozoan pathogens, might also show anti-toxoplasmic activity. Tubercidin and a series of eleven 7-substituted analogues including 2-deoxy and 3-deoxyribofuranoses was tested against intracellular Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites. The test compounds yielded EC50 values between 0.012 and 1.72 {micro}M, well below those of the control drug sulfadiazine (11.9 {micro}M) and the previously identified purine analogue adenosine arabinoside (Ara-A; 11.4 {micro}M). The tubercidin analogues displayed at most moderate toxicity to HFF cells, with the most efficacious compound, 7-(3,4-di-Cl-phenyl)-3-deoxytubercidin (FH8513) reaching a selectivity index of >2500. These nucleosides are most likely taken up by T. gondii through one of the four Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters (ENTs) encoded by the parasites. However, deletion of TgENT2 and/or TgENT3 had no effect on the EC50 values, and deletion of TgAT1 actually sensitised the tachyzoites to most of the tubercidin analogues. We propose that these nucleosides are internalised through the TgENT1 uridine transporter and that the sensitisation in {Delta}TgAT1 cells is the result of reduced uptake of adenosine that competes with the tubercidin analogues for metabolic enzymes such as adenosine kinase.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.3%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
15.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
6
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
7
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
10
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
21
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%