Back

Hyaluronan and skin elasticity: Are subterranean mammals special?

Caspar, K. R.; del Marmol, D.; Gerdes, L.; Zockoll, A.; Schülpen, S.; Begall, S.

2026-02-12 zoology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705254 bioRxiv
Show abstract

It has been hypothesized that subterranean mammals have evolved increased skin elasticity to reduce friction when moving through their underground tunnel systems. This trait is commonly believed to be mediated by greatly elongated hyaluronan (HA) polymers in the dermal extracellular matrix, which have been reported from different distantly related burrowing mammals. However, replicating these findings has proven difficult, and a mechanism by which HA polymer size could modify skin elasticity has not been proposed. In fact, experimental data on skin biomechanics in burrowing mammals are currently unavailable. Here, we quantify the molecular mass of HA polymers extracted from the tissues of Ansells mole-rat (Fukomys anselli), a burrowing rodent yet unstudied in that respect, and investigate skin biomechanics in subterranean and epigeic small mammal species by means of in vivo-cutometry. We did not recover extremely elongated HA polymers in Ansells mole-rat, conflicting with published findings in congeneric species and the naked mole-rat. Polymer length in mole-rats was found to be moderately increased compared to guinea pigs across tissues, though. Our data on skin biomechanics indicate that subterranean mammal skin is not more elastic than that of epigeic forms. Interestingly, the skin of the naked mole-rat was characterized by very high stiffness. Uniaxial tensile tests demonstrated that it also exhibits exceptional tensile strength. Hence, we challenge the idea that hyaluronan or a subterranean ecology notably influences skin elasticity in small mammals and suggest that previous studies may have confused elasticity with skin looseness, a fundamentally different phenomenon.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
12
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Matrix Biology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%