Back

The variability of reflex amplitude estimates in motor unit pools depends on the phenotype distribution and discharge statistics

Schmid, L.; Klotz, T.; Röhrle, O.; Thompson, C. K.; Negro, F.; Yavuz, U. S.

2026-02-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.11.705250 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motor unit (MU) activity during electrically or mechanically evoked reflexes is used to examine the relationship between neural inputs and MU properties. However, variations in single-MU reflex amplitudes are not fully understood and limit their reliability in determining the input-output relation of motor neurons (MNs). Using experiments and computer simulations, we investigated (i) whether MN discharge statistics and muscle activation explain the variability of reflex amplitude estimates and (ii) whether these variations are reflected differently across distinct reflex amplitude estimation methods. We analyzed MU spike trains extracted from isometric contractions of the tibialis anterior muscle at 10 % and 20 % MVC (maximum voluntary contraction). Estimating reflex amplitudes based on the peristimulus frequencygram (PSF) at 10 % MVC, the linear regression between discharge rate (DR) and reflex amplitude was always positive, with p < 0.05 in 3 out of 6 subjects; however, the linear correlation was inconsistent at 20 % MVC. We thereby observed that inter-subject variability was associated with the coefficient of variation of the interspike intervals. Furthermore, the linear correlation between DR and peristimulus time histogram (PSTH) based reflex amplitudes was inconsistent for both contraction forces. To obtain further insights into the influence of MN properties, we simulated reflexes in a heterogeneous MN population using electrical circuit models and varied MN inputs. The simulations indicate that, besides mean input current and membrane noise, MN properties also contribute to the variability of reflex amplitude estimates. The MN heterogeneity is well captured by PSF-based reflex estimates but not by PSTH-based ones. These results show that variations in amplitude estimates of individual MU reflexes are due to complex interactions between intrinsic and extrinsic factors. As PSF-based reflex amplitude estimates reflect the MN size distribution, tracking PSF-based reflex amplitudes at fixed MVC levels across individual subjects could serve as a marker for investigating spinal adaptations under (patho)physiological conditions. Author summaryMotor neurons are specialized nerve cells that control human movement. Each motor neuron activates a specific set of muscle fibers, and the functional unit consisting of a motor neuron and muscle fibers is called a motor unit. We can observe the activity of motor neurons in humans by decomposing the electrical activity of muscles (the electromyogram) into contributions from individual motor units. Reflex responses of motor units are often used to study the input-output relation of motor neurons in humans. We used a combination of experiments and computer simulations to study the factors that influence the reflex amplitude of motor units during an excitatory reflex. We found that the reflex amplitude is non-linearly influenced by a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, e. g., motor neuron size, but also the muscle force. Additionally, we found that these factors have different effects on the results of the two common methods used to calculate the reflex amplitude. These results provide guidance on choosing a suitable evaluation method and on interpreting reflex experiments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.5%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
16
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%