Back

Biases introduced by Ficoll-based isolation in acute myeloid leukemia sample analyses support the use of hemolysis

E Silva, B.; Daubry, A.; Faville, C.; De Voeght, A.; Foguenne, J.; Jassin, M.; Kwan, O.; Correia Da Cruz, L.; Carriglio, G.; Charles, S.; Baron, F.; Caers, J.; Gothot, A.; Ehx, G.

2026-02-12 cell biology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous malignancy whose characterization relies on immunophenotyping and molecular profiling. While hemolysis is recommended for leukocyte isolation in clinical diagnostics, Ficoll-based density gradient centrifugation is widely used in research and biobanking. Here, we evaluated the impact of Ficoll isolation on commonly performed analyses of AML samples. Ficoll altered flow cytometry-based characterization by systematically enriching lymphocytes and AML blasts while depleting granulocytes. The increased T-cell content impaired AML engraftment in NSG mice, as T cells mediated terminal graft-versus-host disease. Although Ficoll had minimal impact on ex vivo AML blast expansion or chemotherapy response, RNA sequencing identified 1,136 differentially expressed genes compared with hemolysis, with Ficoll-processed samples notably leading to an overestimation of leukemic stem cell gene set expression. Immunogenomic deconvolution highlighted that Ficoll leads to an overestimation of CD8+ T-cell and monocyte abundances in sequenced samples. Mutation calling from RNA-seq data revealed substantial discrepancies between methods, including failure to detect a clinically relevant DNMT3A R882 mutation in a Ficoll-processed sample. Together, these findings support the systematic use of hemolysis to preserve cellular diversity and avoid unpredictable biases introduced by Ficoll-based isolation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
8
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
14
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
17
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
22
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
26
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
29
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%