Back

Domestication reduces drought tolerance in watermelon through loss of root plasticity traits

Shemer, O. E.; Bloom, Z. M.; Gal, S.; Peleg, G.; Cochavi, A.

2026-02-12 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705227 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wild plants, particularly those native to xeric environments, are highly adapted to survive under harsh conditions. These adaptive strategies primarily ensure the successful transfer of genetic material to subsequent generations, often independently of fruit size or quality. In contrast, more than 10,000 years of domestication have shifted plant strategies away from survival-oriented traits toward increase in yield and fruit quality. In this study, we characterized both shared and divergent physiological traits contributing to drought tolerance in wild and domesticated watermelon genotypes. Specifically, we compared above- and belowground responses to water limitation in desert watermelon (Citrullus colocynthis) versus these in a watermelon cultivar (Citrullus lanatus). While aboveground responses to water scarcity were largely similar between the two genotypes, pronounced differences emerged belowground. Root biomass and surface area in the cultivated watermelon were predominantly concentrated in the upper soil layers. In contrast, desert watermelon displayed substantial root system plasticity under drought conditions. Although total root biomass remained largely distributed in the upper soil layers, root surface area shifted toward deeper soil layers, indicating enhanced water acquisition from deeper soil layers without additional biomass investment. These findings suggest that domesticated watermelon, despite originating from desert-adapted ancestors, has largely lost the capacity for dynamic root system adjustment in response to spatial and temporal variation in soil water availability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.0%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
13
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
14
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
17
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
24
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%