Back

Resident cardiac macrophages are not required for normal atrioventricular node conduction

Al-Othman, S.; Wu, Y.; Fontanaud, P.; Puttur, F.; Conesa, D.; Zhu, C.; Moore, S.; Tikhomirov, R.; Francis, A.; Nair, S.; Chowdhury, R. A.; Husain, M.; Boyle, J. J.; Oceandy, D.; Niederer, S. A.; Walton, R.; Howell, G.; Roberts, L.; Boyett, M. R.; Colman, M. A.; Mangoni, M. E.; D'Souza, A.

2026-02-12 physiology
10.64898/2026.02.11.704506 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Resident cardiac macrophages are understood to facilitate atrioventricular (AV) node conduction because they purportedly couple to AV node myocytes via connexin43 (Cx43) containing gap junctions. We tested this mechanism using biophysical modelling, high-resolution imaging of mouse and human AV conduction tissue, and pharmacological macrophage depletion. In silico, coupling macrophage membrane phenotypes to HCN4+ AV node myocytes imposed an electrotonic load that suppressed pacemaking and promoted conduction slowing, including stable 2:1 block in strand simulations. Anatomically, HCN4-defined components of the mouse AV conduction axis were essentially devoid of Cx43 and overlap of CD68+ macrophages and Cx43 was negligible in both mouse AV node and human penetrating bundle. Finally, near-complete macrophage depletion with CSF1R inhibition (PLX5622) did not alter AV electrical activity in vivo or ex vivo. Together, these data argue against a physiologically relevant role for Cx43-mediated macrophage-myocyte electrical coupling in normal AV node function. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIModelling predicts that AV node automaticity and conduction would be suppressed if macrophages coupled to AV node myocytes C_LIO_LIThe mouse AV conduction axis is essentially devoid of Cx43, currently considered responsible for macrophage-AV node myocyte coupling C_LIO_LIOverlap of macrophages and Cx43 expression is not discernible in the Cx43-expressing human distal AV node C_LIO_LIMacrophage depletion by CSF1R inhibition does not impact AV electrical activity in vivo or ex vivo C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.2%
2
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
7
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
14
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
19
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%