Back

Using auxotrophic donor strains to explore pQBR57 plasmid host range among environmental soil bacterial isolates

Marquiegui-Alvaro, A.; Kottara, A.; Thomas, M. J. N.; Scarampi, A.; Chacon, M.; Brockhurst, M. A.; Dixon, N.

2026-02-11 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.11.702040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmid host range (PHR) plays a key role in the spread of ecologically important genes, alongside applications in microbiome engineering, and environmental biotechnology. PHR is a complex trait arising from the combination of plasmid, donor and recipient properties. Most studies of PHR use a single donor strain, leaving the role of the donor unexplored, and often require genetically tagged recipient strains for counter selection, which limits use of non-genetically tractable strains. Here we developed a PHR screening method using auxotrophic donors that bypasses the need to genetically tag recipients, thus allowing the screening of culturable environmental bacterial strains. Specifically, we used two auxotrophic donors (P. fluorescens and P. putida), and the plasmid pQBR57-tphKAB, an environmental plasmid engineered for terephthalic acid bioremediation. We screened a library of 101 soil isolates, as potential recipients, including common soil genera of soil bacteria, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Xanthomonas. We only observed conjugation into other Pseudomonas, but donor identity affected PHR, with P. fluorescens conjugating the plasmid into more recipient strains than P. putida. Phylogenomic analysis revealed that transconjugants clustered with P. citronellosis and P. putida lineages. In strains that were close relatives of transconjugants but who were unable to acquire the plasmid, we observed 5 defence systems not present in transconjugants that may act as barriers to plasmid acquisition. Our method provides a rapid, tag-free framework for screening PHR in environmental isolates and for investigating the influence of donor identity on plasmid conjugation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
12
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
15
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%