Canadian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (CACPR) Exercise Training Recommendations in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation
Hopkins-Rosseel, D.; Harris, J.; Aver Bretanha Ribeiro, P.; Bacon, S. L.; Hansen, N.; Hartley, T.; Hebert, A.-A.; E. Kimber, D.; Mabey, B.-J.; Marques Vieira, A.; Prince Ware, S.; Warner, P.; Way, K.; Yeung, C.
Show abstract
Exercise training is a cornerstone of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation (CR) and, as of now, moderate-to-vigorous continuous exercise training (MICT) is the standard. New exercise modalities in the context of CR are constantly being explored to improve patient outcomes. These Canadian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (CACPR) exercise training recommendations provide a synthesis of evidence-informed recommendations from existing documents, including recommendations around High-Intensity Interval training (HIIT). CACPR created a pan-Canadian Exercise Working Group with various knowledge users (e.g., kinesiologists/exercise physiologists, physiotherapists, cardiologists, and patients) with expertise in CR-based exercise, who developed knowledge gap questions related to exercise training based on a literature review and synthesis of all available recommendations. An independent evidence-synthesis team performed a rapid review and meta-analyses to address the questions. The working group used this data to develop relevant recommendations. The final guidelines include 12 recommendations for CR exercise, including nine from previous documents and three new recommendations based on HIIT. The previous recommendations address exercise assessments and prescriptions for CR for various patient profiles. The new recommendations suggest that HIIT can be used to improve exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF) or atrial fibrillation. They also state that HIIT is superior to MICT in patients with CAD, that patients with HF should be considered for either HIIT or MICT and that any HIIT interval duration can be used as part of CR. Overall, these recommendations provide guidance for exercise in Canadian CR programs.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
- The association between influenza vaccination, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality: a protocol for a living systematic review and prospective meta-analysis 93%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 93%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 94%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of an early invasive strategy compared to a conservative approach in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome 94%
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 92%
- Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination 91%
- Bias as a source of inconsistency in ivermectin trials for COVID-19: A systematic review 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.