Group programmes to improve the skills, confidence and wellbeing of caregivers of children with neurodisability: a systematic review of effects
Prest, K.; Barnicot, K.; Drew, S.; Hurt, C.; Nicklin, D.; Harden, A.; Heys, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundCaregiver skills training programmes are well-researched in the fields of autism and intellectual disability, but children with motor disorders such as cerebral palsy remain underrepresented despite their high prevalence. These caregivers face unique challenges, and group programmes may provide family-centred care through information provision, problem-solving and peer support. MethodsSystematic searches of five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and ERIC) were conducted for interventional studies of group programmes aiming to improve the skills, confidence and wellbeing of caregivers of children with neurodisability focusing on motor disorders. Data were extracted on study and intervention characteristics and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed, effect sizes calculated, and results summarised descriptively using forest plots. ResultsOf 6093 studies identified, 21 studies met inclusion criteria (nine randomised-controlled trials, two quasi-experimental and ten pre-post designs). Most reported on programmes developed in resource-constrained settings and addressed caregiver skills, coping strategies, or health-promoting behaviours. Outcomes were grouped according to caregiver wellbeing, caregiver skills and confidence, and social support and family functioning. Child outcomes were reported separately. Most caregiver outcomes showed positive effects, though most studies had high risk of bias due to self-reported outcomes and lack of blinding of intervention allocation and outcome measurement. DiscussionGroup-based training programmes show promise for improving caregiver skills and wellbeing. Clinicians and stakeholders in high-income countries may learn from these innovations in low-resource settings. Future research should strengthen protocol reporting, address attrition, control for confounding factors, and establish a core set of caregiver-reported outcomes to better capture programme impact. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO registration CRD42024595002
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Child and caregiver mental health during COVID-19 92%
- Early activity and impact of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary team that integrates health, and social support for underserved children and young people in Birmingham, UK: an observational study 91%
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can instructions and feedback with external focus be shaped to enhance motor learning in children? A systematic review 95%
- Nurturing care practices for children with developmental disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Developing a context-relevant psychosocial stimulation intervention to promote cognitive development of children with severe acute malnutrition in Mwanza, Tanzania 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregiver-mediated interventions to support self-regulation among infants and young children (0-5): A protocol for a realist review 96%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 94%
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 90%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 92%
- General population screening for type 1 diabetes using islet autoantibodies at the preschool vaccination visit: a proof-of-concept study (the T1Early study) 91%
- Trends in neural tube defects in Scotland 2000-2021 prior to the introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification of non-wholemeal wheat flour: a population-based study 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.