Back

What are the experiences of children and families who use a robotic walker in their home environment? A qualitative study

Youngblood, J. L.; Hilderley, A. J.; Condliffe, E. G.

2026-02-14 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346097 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeRobotic walkers are a new and novel technology with growing evidence of benefits for children living with mobility impairments. However, little is known about how using these devices at home impacts families. This study aims to explore parents perceptions of home-based robotic walking and the impacts on their family and their child living with a mobility impairment. Materials and MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted with seven parents who have a child who used a robotic walker in their home for at least six months. Thematic analysis was used to analyze all interviews. Themes were then mapped to the F-words for child development. ResultsUsing a robotic walker at home led to family bonding and created new ways for parents and siblings to interact with the child living with a mobility impairment. Many children enjoyed using the robotic walker. This, combined with being able to direct its use in their own environments, contributed to less parental stress than was associated with other rehabilitation interventions. However, some parents discussed an increase in parental stress due to certain logistical aspects, getting their child in and out and transporting the robotic walker. Finally, parents discussed that obtaining the device was a financial burden for them. ConclusionRobotic walking in the home environment impacts family relationships and parental stress. Understanding families experiences can inform decision-making by families and practitioners around the appropriateness of robotic walker use for a child living with a disability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.8%
2
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
7
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%