What are the experiences of children and families who use a robotic walker in their home environment? A qualitative study
Youngblood, J. L.; Hilderley, A. J.; Condliffe, E. G.
Show abstract
PurposeRobotic walkers are a new and novel technology with growing evidence of benefits for children living with mobility impairments. However, little is known about how using these devices at home impacts families. This study aims to explore parents perceptions of home-based robotic walking and the impacts on their family and their child living with a mobility impairment. Materials and MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted with seven parents who have a child who used a robotic walker in their home for at least six months. Thematic analysis was used to analyze all interviews. Themes were then mapped to the F-words for child development. ResultsUsing a robotic walker at home led to family bonding and created new ways for parents and siblings to interact with the child living with a mobility impairment. Many children enjoyed using the robotic walker. This, combined with being able to direct its use in their own environments, contributed to less parental stress than was associated with other rehabilitation interventions. However, some parents discussed an increase in parental stress due to certain logistical aspects, getting their child in and out and transporting the robotic walker. Finally, parents discussed that obtaining the device was a financial burden for them. ConclusionRobotic walking in the home environment impacts family relationships and parental stress. Understanding families experiences can inform decision-making by families and practitioners around the appropriateness of robotic walker use for a child living with a disability.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis 95%
- Design of a Clinical Balance Tool for Fall Risk Assessments: A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of Adults with Upper-limb Difference and their Views on Sensory Feedback for Prostheses: A Mixed Methods Study 96%
- Overground robotic walker use in the home and community: a six-month prospective cohort study 95%
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 93%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 93%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 95%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 95%
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Bedside Scale for Assessing Upper Limb Function Following Stroke: A Methodological Study 92%
- Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada 90%
- Retrospective analysis of the use of osteoporosis medication at the presentation of fragility fractures in a predominantly Hispanic population. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.