Back

Characterizing Features of the Genetic Architecture Underlying Autism from a Multi-Ancestry Perspective

Mendes de Aquino, M.; Yang Xu, C.; Engchuan, W.; Trost, B.; Zhou, X.; Salazar, N. B.; Iglar, J.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; Wallich, L.; de Paiva, T. H.; Tarazona-Santos, E.; Fernandez, B.; Borda, V.; Scherer, S. W.

2026-02-12 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346086 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD; MIM 209850) is reported to vary globally from 0.01% in East Asian populations to 4.36% in certain Australian cohorts. Despite high heritability estimates (61-94%), the genetic architecture underlying ASD susceptibility remains poorly characterized across diverse populations, as most genomic studies have initially focused on individuals of European ancestry. To investigate ancestry-specific genetic contributions to ASD, we analyzed whole-genome sequencing data from three independent ASD cohorts. We identified admixed ASD probands (n = 1 033) and ancestry-matched controls (n = 1 033) and performed admixture mapping (AM). AM using five continental reference populations (European, African, East Asian, South Asian, and Native American) identified five ancestry-specific ASD-susceptibility loci, including one African-related locus at 1p21.2 near S1PR1 and four Native American-associated loci at chromosome 11q13.4. Three of these latter loci were contiguous and encompassed genes previously implicated in ASD, notably SHANK2 and DHCR7, with fine-mapping identifying a significantly associated variant between the two genes (rs77695321; P = 1.52 x 10-). The fourth Native American-associated signal at 11q13.4 overlapped the folate receptor genes FOLR1 and FOLR3, with fine-mapping identifying a genome-wide significant variant (rs7950807; P = 5.21 x 10-). A secondary admixture mapping analysis restricted to Latin American individuals, incorporating 6 487 Brazilian controls, identified 16 additional ancestry-specific loci across seven genomic regions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.