Mapping Stakeholder Alignment for Deprescribing Policy in France: Insights from a Policy Delphi Approach
Oliveira, S.; Dariel, O.; Brunn, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith growing efforts aimed at optimizing health care services by reducing "low value care", medical deprescribing represents a critical policy challenge at the intersection of clinical quality, fiscal sustainability, and environmental stewardship. Despite growing evidence of its benefits, France lacks a comprehensive national framework for systematic medication review and deprescribing implementation. ObjectiveTo identify areas of consensus and divergence among key French stakeholders using an adapted Policy Delphi approach to inform national deprescribing policy development. MethodsAn exploratory survey was conducted among stakeholders across five groups (healthcare professionals, patients, academia, policymakers, and the pharmaceutical industry). Consensus levels were assessed using graded Likert scales and analysed across policy domains, including knowledge and training, collaboration, resources, policy support, and sustainability opportunities. ResultsHigh consensus emerged around knowledge gaps, the need for interprofessional collaboration, and clinical benefits of deprescribing. Moderate consensus existed regarding resource constraints and environmental sustainability. Divergence was observed between professionals/academia and policymakers/industry regarding financial incentives and regulatory readiness. A policy Delphi heatmap revealed specific alignment patterns that could serve as policy entry points. ConclusionsMulti-stakeholder consensus mapping provides an innovative governance tool for identifying actionable policy opportunities and contributes to recent tools aimed at reducing low-value care. High-consensus domains, including training, patient safety, and sustainability, offer immediate entry points for coalition-building. On the contrary, areas of divergence require structured dialogue and iterative policy learning among Frances fragmented governance structures to translate stakeholder alignment into systematic deprescribing implementation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 91%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 91%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 94%
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 93%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 94%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 94%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 90%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 90%
- The Acceptability of a Tobacco Dependency Treatment for NHS Staff in the North East of England: A Mixed-Methods Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015-2019: A content analysis 92%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 90%
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.