Back

Mapping Stakeholder Alignment for Deprescribing Policy in France: Insights from a Policy Delphi Approach

Oliveira, S.; Dariel, O.; Brunn, M.

2026-02-12 health policy
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346080 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWith growing efforts aimed at optimizing health care services by reducing "low value care", medical deprescribing represents a critical policy challenge at the intersection of clinical quality, fiscal sustainability, and environmental stewardship. Despite growing evidence of its benefits, France lacks a comprehensive national framework for systematic medication review and deprescribing implementation. ObjectiveTo identify areas of consensus and divergence among key French stakeholders using an adapted Policy Delphi approach to inform national deprescribing policy development. MethodsAn exploratory survey was conducted among stakeholders across five groups (healthcare professionals, patients, academia, policymakers, and the pharmaceutical industry). Consensus levels were assessed using graded Likert scales and analysed across policy domains, including knowledge and training, collaboration, resources, policy support, and sustainability opportunities. ResultsHigh consensus emerged around knowledge gaps, the need for interprofessional collaboration, and clinical benefits of deprescribing. Moderate consensus existed regarding resource constraints and environmental sustainability. Divergence was observed between professionals/academia and policymakers/industry regarding financial incentives and regulatory readiness. A policy Delphi heatmap revealed specific alignment patterns that could serve as policy entry points. ConclusionsMulti-stakeholder consensus mapping provides an innovative governance tool for identifying actionable policy opportunities and contributes to recent tools aimed at reducing low-value care. High-consensus domains, including training, patient safety, and sustainability, offer immediate entry points for coalition-building. On the contrary, areas of divergence require structured dialogue and iterative policy learning among Frances fragmented governance structures to translate stakeholder alignment into systematic deprescribing implementation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%