Back

AI-powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI): a Comprehensive Multiparametric Neurological Protocol from a Single MRI Scan

Lewis, J.; Goyal, m. S.; Wu, G. F.; Hu, Y.; Sukstanskii, A. L.; Kothapalli, S. V.; Cross, A. H.; Kamilov, U.; Yablonskiy, D. A.

2026-02-12 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346017 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMRI plays an essential role in diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Conventional protocols rely on multiple sequences to obtain complementary contrasts, increasing scan time, cost, and tolerability. Generating multiple contrasts from a single acquisition may streamline workflow while maintaining clinical utility. PurposeTrain attention-based convolutional neural networks (ACNNs) to generate clinical-quality FLAIR, MPRAGE, R2*, and derived contrasts from a single Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (GEPCI) acquisition, enabling multi-contrast imaging from one scan. Study TypeRetrospective. Population43 MRI scans from individuals with multiple sclerosis (25/18 F/M, 49{+/-}11 years old). Field Strength/Sequence3T MRI was used to obtain 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, and FLAIR sequences. AssessmentTechnical quality of the AI-generated contrasts was evaluated against directly acquired MRI images using structural similarity index (SSIM). Quantitative accuracy for R2* maps was evaluated using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE). Clinical image quality was assessed by expert physicians. Lesion volumes and counts were obtained using automated segmentation. ResultsAI-generated FLAIR and MPRAGE images achieved mean SSIM values of 0.923{+/-}0.028 and 0.935{+/-}0.022, respectively. The generated R2* maps achieved a mean SSIM of 0.996{+/-}0.006, with quantitative accuracy reflected by an NRMSE of 0.031{+/-}0.020. Physicians rated GEPCI-FLAIR images at 4.2 and GEPCI-MPRAGE images at 4.5 (on a 1-to-5 scale), both exceeding the clinically routine standard of 4.0. Lesion volume and count comparisons from automated segmentation showed strong agreement between AI-generated and ground-truth measurements (R{superscript 2}=0.988 and R{superscript 2}=0.933, respectively). ConclusionAI-GEPCI generated multiple clinically relevant MRI contrasts from a single GEPCI acquisition with high similarity to corresponding acquired images. Radiological reviews and quantitative analyses supported the feasibility of producing high-quality, intrinsically co-registered multi-contrasts for comprehensive brain evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
4
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%