Back

Portal Vein Diameter on Routine Clinical CT: Establishing Normals and Disease Associations

Hartmann, K.; Beeche, C.; Judy, R.; DePietro, D. M.; Witschey, W. R.; Duda, J.; Gee, J.; Gade, T.; Penn Medicine Biobank, ; Levin, M.; Damrauer, S. M.

2026-02-14 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346009 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePortal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, leads to significant morbidity and mortality. While portal vein diameter measured on imaging has long been proposed as a non-invasive marker of portal hypertension, normative CT-based reference values and population-level associations remain incompletely characterized. Here, we aim to define contemporary reference values for portal vein diameter on clinically obtained CT and evaluate its associations with demographic, clinical, and imaging factors, as well as its diagnostic performance for portal hypertension. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 20,225 clinically obtained CT scans at a single academic medical center. The main portal vein was automatically segmented using Total Segmentator, and maximum diameter extracted using the Vascular Modeling Toolkit. Associations with demographic and imaging factors were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models; prevalent liver disease and portal hypertension using logistic regression; risk of incident ascites and esophageal varices among participants with liver disease using Cox regression; and invasive hepatic venous pressures using correlation analysis and linear regression. ResultsThe mean portal vein diameter was 12.4 mm (95% CI, 12.37-12.45). Larger diameter was independently associated with male sex (+1.4 mm), higher BMI (+0.11 mm/kg/m2), greater height (+0.04 mm/cm), and older age (+0.05 mm/10 years) (all p <0.001), and was substantially larger on contrast-enhanced abdomen/pelvis CT (+2.4 mm, p <0.001). Each 1-mm increase in portal vein diameter was associated with higher odds of prevalent liver disease (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08) and portal hypertension (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28). Among individuals with liver disease, greater diameter predicted higher risk of incident esophageal varices (baseline diameter HR 1.50; 95% CI, 1.14-2.08) and ascites (HR per mm increase in diameter 1.06; 95% CI, 1.003-1.12). However, portal vein diameter demonstrated weak to no association with invasively measured hepatic venous pressures. ConclusionIn this large, EHR-linked imaging cohort, the mean portal vein diameter on CT was 12.4 mm and varied with demographic and imaging factors. Larger diameter was associated with liver disease, portal hypertension, and subsequent development of varices and ascites, supporting use of portal vein diameter as a pragmatic screening or enrichment tool within multimodal clinical frameworks. Key ResultsO_LIMean portal vein diameter on routine clinical CT was 12.4 mm (95% CI, 12.37-12.45) and varied with sex, height, BMI, exam type, contrast use, and clinical setting. C_LIO_LIEach 1-mm increase in portal vein diameter was associated with higher odds of prevalent liver disease (OR 1.06) and portal hypertension (OR 1.18). C_LIO_LIAmong individuals with liver disease, larger portal vein diameter predicted higher risk of incident esophageal varices and ascites, independent of demographic and imaging factors. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
3
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
6
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
19
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
29
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%