Back

Absence of EOGT Precludes Defective Development in Fringe-null Mouse Intestine

Nauman, M.; Stanley, P.

2026-02-11 cell biology
10.64898/2026.02.10.705133 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying biological roles for glycosyltransferases is a continuing challenge and important for defining morbidities associated with congenital disorders of glycosylation. Here we investigate the consequences to intestinal development of conditionally deleting Lfng alone or Lfng, Mfng and Rfng together in a mixed or Eogt-null genetic background. Each Fringe transfers N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to fucose (Fuc) attached to Ser or Thr by POFUT1 in a consensus sequence found in certain epithelial growth factor-like (EGF) repeats. EOGT transfers GlcNAc directly to Ser/Thr in a separate consensus sequence of the EGF repeat. Notch receptors and Notch ligands contain the largest number of EGF repeats with consensus sites for these O-glycans. Conditional deletion of Pofut1 in mouse intestine causes similar developmental defects to deletion of Notch1 and Notch2 or Dll1 and Dll4. LFNG also contributes to optimal Notch signaling in mouse intestine. In this work, we generated Lfng[F/F]:Villin-Cre and Lfng[F/F]Mfng[-/-]Rfng[-/-]:Villin-Cre mice in which extension of O-Fuc on EGF repeats was inhibited or prevented in intestinal epithelium. Conditional deletion of either Lfng alone or all three Fringe activities together led to defective intestinal development with a marked increase in goblet and Paneth cells, increased crypt width and reduced villus length. Unexpectedly, in mice globally lacking EOGT, conditional inactivation of the three Fringe genes did not lead to defective intestinal development. Thus, the absence of EOGT prevented disruption of development in Fringe-null intestine, identifying a novel role for EOGT in regulating intestinal development.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
14.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
4
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.6%
12
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
17
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%