Back

Area Deprivation, Social Vulnerability, and Post-Pregnancy Blood Pressure

Gaffey, A. E.; Burg, M. M.; Kozai, A. C.; Nuckols, V. R.; Wu, J.; Kershaw, K. N.; Grobman, W.; Barone Gibbs, B.

2026-02-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346041 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPregnancy is a critical test of womens cardiovascular risk. Structural factors may influence long-term cardiovascular health beyond individual, social experiences. We examined associations of neighborhood-level deprivation and individual-level social vulnerability (SV) during pregnancy with postpartum blood pressure (BP). MethodsThis secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study used data from 3,728 nulliparous women in the nuMoM2b-HHS cohort followed from early pregnancy to 2-7 years post-delivery (Mage: 30.8 years, 65% non-Hispanic White, 14% with adverse pregnancy outcomes [APOs]). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models tested relations of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and SV (a composite of perceived stress, discrimination, pregnancy experiences, social support, health literacy, depression, and anxiety) with systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and incident hypertension, adjusting for demographic and behavioral covariates. Effect modification by APO history was assessed. ResultsIn unadjusted models, both ADI and greater SV were positively associated with SBP and DBP (all ps<0.001). After adjustment, ADI remained positively associated with BP: each 10-unit increase in ADI was associated with 1.0 mmHg higher SBP (p=0.008) and 0.6 mmHg higher DBP (p=0.013). However, SV was no longer associated with BP after adjustment. ADI and SV were not associated with incident hypertension. No evidence of effect modification by APO history was observed (interactions p>0.20). ConclusionsNeighborhood deprivation during pregnancy was associated with higher BP up to seven years later, independent of individual social vulnerability. Structural context during pregnancy may contribute to early maternal cardiovascular risk.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.8%
2
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
3
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
7
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
22
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
24
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%