Back

An LLM-assisted framework for accelerated and verifiable clinical hypothesis testing from electronic health records

Gim, N.; Gim, I.; Jiang, Y.; Kihara, Y.; Blazes, M.; Wu, Y.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, A. Y.

2026-02-12 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346008 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acquiring insights from electronic health records (EHRs) is slowed by manual analytical workflows that limit scalability and reproducibility. We present LATCH (LLM-Assisted Testing of Clinical Hypotheses), an agentic framework that converts natural language clinical hypotheses into fully auditable analyses on structured EHR data. LATCH integrates LLM-assisted semantic layers with deterministic execution pipelines to automate cohort construction, statistical analysis, and result reporting, while isolating patient-level data from LLM-involved steps. Using diabetes as a model disease, LATCH reproduced findings from 20 published studies within 3-15 minutes per study. Beyond replication, LATCH enabled study extensions and new insight generation through simple natural language hypothesis modifications. We demonstrated LATCH across 102 hypothesis tests spanning reproduction, extension, and insight generation. We systematically stress-tested LATCH to characterize its limitations and operational boundaries. LATCH provides a scalable framework for reproducible real-world evidence generation, reducing analytical bottlenecks and improving reliability of AI-assisted biomedical discovery while preserving human oversight.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
9
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
24
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
28
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%