Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Across the Heart Failure Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ferreira, V. M.; Muller, V. A.
Show abstract
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) versus placebo in adults with heart failure (HF), searching PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2026. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and first HF hospitalization. Random-effects meta-analysis used restricted maximum likelihood estimation with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment. We included 14 studies (6 dedicated HF trials and 8 cardiovascular outcomes trial HF subgroup analyses) encompassing 18,558 patients, of whom 2,499 were randomized in dedicated HF trials. The primary composite did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.01; P=0.067; I2=47%). GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93; P<0.001; I2=0%), major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95; P=0.019), and improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (+7.4 points, 95% CI 6.3-8.5) and 6-minute walk distance (+17.6 m, 95% CI 13.4-21.7). Excluding the FIGHT trial (acute HFrEF) yielded a significant primary composite (HR 0.83, P=0.011). The mortality signal was driven primarily by CVOT subgroups; the largest dedicated HFpEF trial (SUMMIT) showed numerically higher mortality (HR 1.25). The strongest evidence supports GLP-1 RAs in HFpEF with obesity. HighlightsO_LIPrimary composite of CV death + HHF was not significant (HR 0.86, P=0.067) C_LIO_LIGLP-1 RAs reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.87) with no heterogeneity C_LIO_LIKCCQ-CSS improved by 7.4 points and 6MWD by 17.6 m in HFpEF trials C_LIO_LIMortality benefit driven by CVOT subgroups, not dedicated HF trials C_LIO_LIStrongest evidence supports GLP-1 RAs in HFpEF with obesity C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 94%
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 93%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 92%
- Which patients did recent trials in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy select? -Insights from a prospective patient registry 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 93%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 92%
- ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel: Reappraisal of Genes associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 92%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 91%
- Natural Language Processing to Identify Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.