Back

Avoidance of simultaneous patch use in Japanese large-footed bats

Fujioka, E.; Shiraishi, M.; Hirao, T.; Onishi, Y.; Fukui, D.; Hiryu, S.

2026-02-11 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.09.704905 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Group foraging can enhance prey detection, but depending on resource availability, it may also generate conflicts among conspecifics. To understand how animals balance these benefits and costs, foraging performance must be evaluated together with inter-individual interactions. However, under fully natural conditions, it remains challenging to quantify both simultaneously. Here, we investigated how individual foraging efficiency and pairwise interactions are shaped when more than one individuals simultaneously exploit the same foraging patch, using the Japanese large-footed bat (Myotis macrodactylus) as a model system. We monitored an entire pond functioning as a natural foraging patch using two thermal cameras and an eight-channel microphone array, and reconstructed the arrival, prey-attack, and exit times of individual bats. Using a Poisson generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we found that prey-attack rates were approximately 25% lower during paired flights than during solitary flights. We then constructed a null model in which arrival, attack, and departure events followed independent Poisson processes parameterized from the empirical data. Compared with null-model predictions, both the total duration and the duration of individual paired flights in the empirical data were significantly shorter, indicating that bats limited the time spent co-using the same patch relative to solitary foraging. In addition, the probability that the first exiting individual was the one that arrived earlier or later did not deviate from chance levels, providing no evidence for a prior residence advantage. Together, these results demonstrate that simultaneous patch use avoidance occurs independently of arrival order and coincides with reduced prey-attack rate, suggesting that bats leave shared patches and move to alternative foraging sites to mitigate losses in prey-attack efficiency. Our findings highlight bats as an excellent model system for non-invasively linking individual behavior and foraging performance via echolocation, and for elucidating the dynamics of foraging behavior and sensory interference in the wild.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
3
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
5
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
11
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
16
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
21
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
24
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%