Back

High-throughput quantification of huntingtin mRNA expression and aggregation in mouse brain using automated RNAscope imaging.

van Velde, P.; Tran, B.; Allen, S.; Luu, E.; Furgal, R.; Summers, A.; Belgrad, J.; Knox, E.; Khvorova, A.; Grunwald, D.

2026-02-11 cell biology
10.64898/2026.02.09.704866 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Huntingtons disease (HD) is a repeat-associated neurodegenerative disorder traditionally characterized by toxic protein pathology resulting from expanded CAG repeats in the huntingtin (HTT) gene. In recent years, however, studies have identified repeat expansion-driven RNA pathology as an additional and potentially independent contributor to disease. In particular, mutant HTT transcripts containing expanded CAG repeats accumulate in the nucleus and form discrete RNA clusters, a feature shared with several other repeat-associated disorders. While protein aggregation and its downstream consequences have been extensively studied, our current understanding of the composition, organization, and dynamics of these nuclear mRNA clusters remains limited. Progress in this area has been constrained in part by the lack of robust methods to detect and quantify expanded HTT transcripts at single-molecule resolution within intact tissue. As a result, the contribution of RNA clustering to disease mechanisms, its relationship to repeat length, and its interaction with other pathological features of HD remain poorly defined. Here we present a high-throughput RNAscope pipeline that combines automated confocal imaging with rigorous microscope characterization to quantify both single mRNA molecules and multi-transcript clusters in fixed mouse brain tissue. Using 3D Gaussian point-spread function (PSF) fitting calibrated on 200 nm fluorescent beads and pointilistic image features from tissue data, we establish per-slide intensity thresholds from negative controls and normalize experimental signals to single-molecule reference intensities. The critical validation of our approach operates at two scales: for single molecules, the linear relationship between spot size and intensity (r2 > 0.90) reflects variable probe binding along transcripts; for clusters, the linear scaling between cluster volume and mRNA content (R2 > 0.98) confirms uniform probe accessibility and enables quantitative conversion of fluorescence intensity to absolute mRNA counts. Applied to HttQ111+/- knock-in mice across multiple ages, we analyzed thousands of fields of view (FOVs), detecting >900,000 single mRNA molecules and segmenting >1.9 million mRNA clusters using two probes targeting mouse huntingtin (Htt): one detecting the spliced transcript that uses early cryptic polyadenylation sites in intron 1 (HTT1a), and one detecting full-length Htt (fl-HTT). Our analysis reveals considerable heterogeneity in mRNA accumulation: 16-63% of Q111 FOVs are classified as "extreme" (exceeding the 95th percentile of wildtype clustered mRNA levels), with striatum showing higher prevalence than cortex for both probes (HTT1a: 63% striatum, 31% cortex; fl-HTT: 44% striatum, 16%cortex). Extreme FOVs are characterized by elevated cluster numbers (2-6x more clusters per nucleus) and higher cluster density (1.3-1.7x more mRNA per {micro}m3). Cluster localization shows nuclear bias ([~]68%) in normal FOVs, but extreme FOVs exhibit a shift toward cytoplasmic localization, particularly for fl-HTT (48% nuclear vs 68% in normal FOVs), though the interpretation of this shift requires further investigation. Despite the large dataset at the cellular level, our study included only 11 mice (9 Q111, 2 wildtype), and this limited sample size precluded robust statistical inference at the animal level. Nevertheless, these quantitative metrics provide a framework for investigating disease mechanisms and evaluating therapeutic interventions using RNAscope in future studies with larger cohorts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.5%
2
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
6
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%