Back

Latent-centric Isotropic Resolution Enhancement for Expansion Microscopy Imaging via Neural Compression and Self-supervised Learning

Lian, P.-H.; Chuang, T.-Y.; Liu, Y.-D.; Chu, L.-A.; Chang, S.-C.; Kuo, Y.-C.; Chang, W.-K.; Chiang, A.-S.; Chang, G.

2026-02-10 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.09.704755 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Expansion microscopy (ExM) enables nanoscale imaging for disease characterization. However, whole-organ analyses remain limited by several challenges. Current super-resolution methods either require high-resolution ground-truth data or assume spatially uniform point spread functions--assumptions that rarely hold in whole-organ imaging with depth-varying aberrations and illumination drift. Existing methods also worsen storage demands by inflating already multi-terabyte datasets without using neural compression. We propose a single-stage, self-supervised framework that addresses both resolution anisotropy and storage constraints through compression-aware isotropic super-resolution. Our approach combines a 2D lateral encoder that operates directly on raw slices to avoid memory limits with a lightweight volumetric decoder that preserves cross-slice continuity. A vector-quantized variational autoencoder (VQ-VAE) provides an information-sufficient bottleneck, achieving up to 128x slice compression and up to 8x axial resolution enhancement. This latent-centric design yields approximately 1000x reduction in storage compared with storing fully isotropic volumes. The framework achieves higher GPU throughput, lower memory usage, and stronger multi-GPU scalability than prior methods. By designating compressed latent space as the native storage format, it enables efficient on-demand isotropic reconstruction directly from compact representations. This combination of isotropic enhancement and neural compression framework therefore makes large-scale, whole-organ ExM analysis practical while maintaining analysis-ready accessibility, addressing a bottleneck in translating ExM to clinical biomarker discovery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.4%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.6%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
15
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.3%
20
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%