Back

Experimental population demography reveals sex specific density dependence as an outcome of sexual conflict

Bränden, A.; Gomez-Llano, M. A.; De Lisle, S. P.

2026-02-09 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.09.704738 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many demographic models assume that only females matter for population dynamics. However, theory and evidence of sexual conflict suggest that males can affect female fitness through mating competition between and within the sexes, yet it is unclear how such effects may influence population dynamics. We used experimental population demography to understand how sexual conflict affects offspring recruitment in Drosophila melanogaster, a model species for studying the evolution of sexual conflict. By manipulating sex ratio and male/female density independently in a response surface design we found that increasing male density, and thereby the intensity of sexual conflict, led to fewer offspring per female, but that effect was nearly half the strength of female density dependence. Consistent with this, our best fitting birth function showed female dominance of births with sex-specific density dependence, indicating that males have a demographic effect even if females have demographic dominance. Our results confirm that females have a larger influence than males on offspring recruitment, however, more importantly our result increases our understanding about the demographic effects males have through sexual conflict.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.0%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
6
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.0%
10
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
19
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
24
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%