Back

Unraveling β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Bias Between Gαs and Gα15 in Shaping Macrophage Function

Sun, Y.-E.; Li, Q.; English, J. G.

2026-02-11 cell biology
10.64898/2026.02.09.704723 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myocardial infarction and heart failure are leading global causes of mortality. Chronic {beta}-adrenergic receptor ({beta}ARs) activation in cardiomyocytes promotes heart failure via Gs signaling after myocardial infarction, whereas {beta}2AR activation may also provide cardiac protection and repair through alternative pathways. Macrophages play a pivotal role in cardiac repair, and {beta}2AR has been reported to signal via the hematopoietic-specific G15 in these cells. We aim to characterize signaling bias between Gs and G15 downstream of {beta}2AR and to elucidate their roles in macrophage polarization. Using TRUPATH BRET assays, we demonstrate that several {beta}2AR agonists activate G15 with at least an order of magnitude greater potency than Gs. Clinically used {beta}-blockers exhibit differential inhibition on these two pathways. Transcriptome analysis of THP-1-derived macrophage-like cells treated with the {beta}2AR agonist clenbuterol revealed a mixed transcriptional profile with enrichment of both M1 inflammatory and M2/repair-associated gene sets. Knockdown experiments showed that Gs suppresses M1-like phenotypes while enhancing M2-like phenotypes, whereas G15 is specifically required for M2-like regulation. Pharmacological blockade of the Gs-adenylyl cyclase interaction produced opposing effects on M1/M2 signatures compared to Gs knockdown, while producing concordant effects on the repair-associated gene sets. These findings characterize the distinct pharmacological profiles of {beta}2AR ligands toward Gs and G15 and reveal how {beta}2AR agonism modulates macrophage function through dual-transducer signaling. Significance statement{beta}2AR displays marked signaling bias toward the hematopoietic-specific G15 over canonical Gs, with multiple clinically relevant agonists activating G15 at [≥]10-fold higher potency. Clinically used {beta}-blockers exhibit differential inhibition--timolol preferentially blocks Gs, while labetalol has reduced efficacy against G15--while in macrophages, Gs suppresses pro-inflammatory M1 programs and supports M2 repair signatures, whereas G15 specifically reinforces M2-associated and tissue-repair transcriptional modules, revealing a dual-transducer mechanism that may enhance macrophage-mediated cardiac repair after myocardial infarction and support biased {beta}2AR ligands.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
4
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.7%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
10
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.3%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
23
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%