Back

X-SPATIO: An Explanatory Deep Learning Pipeline for the Prediction and Visualization of Spatially Resolved Biomarker Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Rao, V. R.; Sadanandappa, M. K.; Black, C. C.; Palisoul, S. M.; Workman, A. A.; MacKenzie, T. A.; Liu, X.; Chamberlin, M. D.; Vaickus, L. J.; Zanazzi, G. J.; Sukhadia, S. S.

2026-02-11 pathology
10.64898/2026.02.09.704587 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histopathologic evaluation remains central to cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, yet the molecular programs underlying distinct tissue morphologies are not routinely accessible in clinical workflows. Spatial transcriptomic/proteomic platforms provide region-specific molecular measurements but are limited by cost, throughput, and scalability. Most computational pathology models rely on either bulk tissue-based gene expression or a focused gene/protein expression-panel prediction, thereby obscuring subregion-specific morpho-molecular relationships and limiting spatial interpretation of a wider gene/protein expression network. This limitation is particularly significant in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity across tumor, stroma, and immune compartments. We developed X-SPATIO, a spatially compatible computational pipeline designed to directly link hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) morphology with region-matched mRNA and protein expression. The model was trained on H&E-defined regions of interest paired with spatially-resolved transcriptomic and proteomic data obtained from GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler. Using a multiple-instance learning approach, X-SPATIO captures morpho-molecular associations, generating spatio-morphologic attention maps that indicate predictive tissue regions. X-SPATIO demonstrated strong performance across biologically relevant spatial biomarkers, achieving area under the curve values ranging [0.79, 0.97]. Attention maps revealed spatial patterns consistent with known biology, indicating alignment between learned features and tissue organization. By integrating spatial molecular ground truth with routine histopathology, X-SPATIO enables cost-effective inference of spatial biomarker expression and establishes a foundation for biologically grounded discovery and precision oncology in TNBC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
19
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
28
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%