Back

Perceptions of Minority Ethnic Groups on Mental Health Electronic Health Records: A Study Protocol

Ikram, A.; Parveen, S.; Wepa, D.; McGuinn, C.; Vaportzis, E.

2026-02-11 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.09.26345920 medRxiv
Show abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have not been widely implemented in mental health settings, representing a significant gap in digital health care transformation. A reason for underutilisation includes concerns from healthcare professionals regarding the collection and storage of patients sensitive information. Language use can positively influence clinician-patient relationships, and stigmatising language in EHRs viewed by patients could undermine trust. This is concerning as using EHRs have benefits which allow patients to feel safe and empowered regarding their care. Moreover, minority ethnic groups have been found to disengage with EHRs and are more likely to access mental health services through crisis pathways. This qualitative study in collaboration with Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust comprises two stages to explore minority ethnic perspectives on mental health EHRs and develop recommendations for their implementation. Stage one investigates minority ethnic service users perceptions on EHRs and explores mental health professionals understanding regarding the sharing of EHRs with service users from minority ethnic groups. The workshops in stage two will use an Experience-Based Co-Design approach to produce practical recommendations for EHR implementation in mental health settings. Participants include minority ethnic service users, mental health professionals, stakeholders, and relevant bodies such as mental health organisations and Information Technology experts utilising EHRs. Data will be gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus groups and workshops, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The study was approved under the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS ID: 348764) and Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales. Findings will be disseminated via social media, blogs, conferences, journals, academic articles, and community and staff meetings held by the Trust. An executive summary will be shared with participants who consented to receive the results.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
3
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%