Back

A Bayesian Framework for Physiologically-Based Modeling of Flutter-Induced Aneurysm Progression

Bhattacharyya, K.

2026-02-11 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.09.26345810 medRxiv
Show abstract

Current clinical risk stratification for thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) relies primarily on maximum diameter, which is a poor predictor of rupture. Recent fluid-structure interaction studies have identified a dimensionless "flutter instability parameter" (N{omega} ) that accurately classifies abnormal aortic growth. However, this parameter currently serves as a static diagnostic snapshot. In this work, we propose a proof-of-concept computational framework that links flutter instability to microstructural tissue damage via a coupled system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We model a feedback loop where flutter-induced energy dissipation drives elastin degradation and collagen remodeling, which in turn reduces wall stiffness and amplifies the instability. To address the challenge of unobservable tissue properties, we implement a Bayesian inference engine to infer model parameters. We demonstrate feasibility on a synthetic patient cohort calibrated to published clinical growth rates and diameters. Our results show that this approach can infer hidden damage parameters and capture the qualitative bifurcation between stabilizing remodeling and runaway aneurysm expansion. While validation on real patient data remains essential, this work establishes the mathematical foundation for transforming a static physiomarker into a personalized prognostic trajectory.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
3
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
18
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%