Reliability of a Simple, Biomechanically Grounded Score for Landing-Mechanics Evaluation

ContextClinical assessments of landing mechanics often require complex scoring systems or laboratory-based motion analysis, which can limit feasibility in routine practice. A visually based landing-mechanics score centered on a standardized optimal joint-alignment configuration ("Zero Position") may offer a simple, clinically deployable alternative. ObjectiveTo determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a landing mechanics score based on standardized optimal joint alignment at the moment of maximal center-of-mass (COM) descent. DesignCross-sectional reliability study. SettingUniversity athletic training facility. Patients or Other ParticipantsNinety healthy male collegiate athletes. Main Outcome MeasuresLanding mechanics were evaluated using frontal- and sagittal-plane video recordings, with scoring performed on the frame corresponding to maximal COM descent. Five criteria reflecting the standardized joint configuration ("Zero Position") were assessed. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated using Cohens kappa coefficients and Kendalls W. ResultsAll five criteria demonstrated moderate to substantial intra-rater reliability and moderate to almost perfect inter-rater reliability. The total landing-mechanics score showed excellent agreement across all comparisons. The scoring system required minimal training and was feasible to implement using standard video recordings. ConclusionsThe landing-mechanics score centered on the Zero Position demonstrated high reliability and strong clinical feasibility. This simple, visually grounded assessment may support routine clinical screening, injury-risk evaluation, and return-to-sport decision-making. Future research should examine its applicability to single-leg landings and sport-specific high-risk movements.