Back

Interoception Network in the Rat Brain

Alkaabi, F. M.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.

2026-02-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.08.704721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain is never truly at rest. Even in the absence of external stimuli or cognitive tasks, the central nervous system continuously receives peripheral signals from visceral organs, such as the heart, lungs, and stomach, and sends motor commands to regulate organ physiology. This bidirectional brain-body interaction, also known as interoception, engages neural pathways via a hierarchical set of brain regions, including the nucleus of the solitary tract, hypothalamus, paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus, insular cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex, among others. However, it is largely unclear to what extent interoceptive signaling shapes ongoing fluctuations and correlations of brain activity. To address this question, we recorded resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 34 anesthetized rats, examined intrinsic correlations (or functional connectivity), and tested their dependence on the bodys digestive state and peripheral nerve integrity. We observed reciprocal functional connectivity among brain regions situated along established interoceptive pathways, revealing a cohesive network, which we refer to as the interoception network. This network showed stronger functional connectivity in the fed condition (digestive phase) compared to the fasted condition (inter-digestive phase), suggesting its dependence on distinct states of gastrointestinal interoception without apparent cardiac or respiratory confounds. Importantly, we found that the interoception network relied on the integrity of the vagus nerve, a primary component of the peripheral nervous system for visceral sensation and parasympathetic control. When vagal signaling was surgically severed by bilateral cervical vagotomy, functional connectivity within the interoception network was notably reduced. Given these findings, we conclude that resting state functional connectivity is not sustained by the central nervous system alone, but relies on interoceptive signaling mediated through peripheral nerves that connect the brain and viscera.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.7%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.0%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.4%
10
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
11
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%