Back

Bridging Simplicity and Depth in Single-Cell Proteomics: A Cost-Effective Workflow and Expanded Framework for Data Evaluation

Chi, S.; Rogalski, J. C.; Zhong, H.; Martinez, E. G.; Ebrahimi, A.; Wong, R.; Bailey, M. L.; Marra, M.; Maier, C. S.; Snutch, T. P.; Foster, L. J.

2026-02-09 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.08.700933 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell proteomics (SCP) offers direct insight into functional protein states that drive cellular heterogeneity, complementing genomic and transcriptomic analyses. Although recent reports have demonstrated improved proteome coverage, their reliance on specialized instrumentation limits broader adoption. Additionally, current evaluation practices remain largely centered on protein and peptide identification counts, which alone do not fully reflect data quality or biological interpretability. Here, we describe an accessible, label-free SCP workflow which implements easily accessible laboratory equipment: a single-cell dispenser, conventional multiwell plates, and an incubator with water-bath-based humidity control. Using trapped ion mobility spectrometry-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (timsTOF), we systematically optimize key sample preparation variables, including trypsin concentration, incubation time, reduction/alkylation, digestion conditions, and plate types, which together maximize data quality and reproducibility. We further introduce a data-quality framework that moves beyond identification counts, emphasizing quantitative consistency and biological interpretability via individual protein coverage completeness across cells, coefficients of variation across technical replicates, peptide-to-protein ratios, and single-cell-to-bulk correlations. Collectively, our approach lowers technical barriers to accessing SCP while enabling more rigorous, interpretable, and scalable SCP analysis across diverse research contexts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
9
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
23
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
26
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%