Back

Empirically grounded projections of shifts in 24-hour movement behaviours under climate change-driven warming.

Ferguson, T. B.; Maher, C.; Curtis, R.; Fraysse, F.; Lechat, B.; Mavoa, S.; Chastin, S. F.

2026-02-10 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.08.26345870 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionClimate change is expected to alter daily patterns of sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity, yet empirically grounded projections across the full 24-hour movement spectrum are lacking. This study estimated how projected future warming may alter 24-hour movement behaviour patterns in adults. MethodsA Monte Carlo simulation framework estimated temperature-dependent distributions of daily movement behaviour duration using data from 368 adults in the Annual Rhythms in Adults (ARIA) study in Adelaide, Australia. A total of 85,182 valid person-days were linked to daily temperature data to determine empirical temperature-behaviour relationships. The resulting distributions were used to simulate behaviour under five Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warming scenarios (+1.5{degrees}C to +4.4{degrees}C above pre-industrial levels) across a full calendar year relative to current-climate conditions (+0.99{degrees}C above pre-industrial levels). ResultsSimulations projected small but consistent behavioural shifts with warming. Annual median increased for MVPA (+49min to +4h 22min per person) and LPA (+3h to +13h 1min per person), while sleep declined (-5h 29min to -23h 19min per person). Physical activity gains were concentrated in cooler months, whereas sleep losses persisted year-round. Changes in sedentary behaviour were minimal and inconsistent. DiscussionRising temperatures may modestly increase year-long physical activity but reduce sleep duration, in a temperate-zone Mediterranean climate geography producing meaningful cumulative health implications. However, these might be confounded by the effect of other meteorological changes such as rainfall and humidity, which warrant further investigation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.