Back

Body surface colonic mapping detects meal and bisacodyl-induced colonic motility in patients with chronic constipation

Verheyden, A.; Dinning, P. G.; O'Grady, G.; Tack, J.; Erickson, J. C.

2026-02-10 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.02.08.26345865 medRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic constipation is highly prevalent, and cases refractory to treatment are particularly challenging to manage. High-resolution colonic manometry (HRM) is used to further evaluate these patients to identify cases of intrinsic motor dysfunction (underlying myopathy or neuropathy). However, HRM is invasive and resource-intensive, limiting uptake and clinical utility. This study presents Body Surface Colonic Mapping (BSCM), a non-invasive cutaneous electrical recording technique, as a clinical alternative. Simultaneous recordings from HRM (36-channel) and BSCM (8x8 electrode array) were performed in 10 patients with chronic refractory constipation. Lower gut symptom scores were also tracked patients over the duration of the recording. Motility was assessed during meal and bisacodyl challenges. We optimized BSCM signal processing specifically to detect high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) evoked by bisacodyl. Analysis included time-frequency quantification of motility indices and blinded visual assessment by domain experts to classify the presence or absence of motor responses. BSCM motility indices showed strong correlation with HRM for both meal (r = 0.86) and bisacodyl (r = 0.69) responses. Expert visual analysis yielded concordant classification between BSCM and HRM in the majority (87.5 {+/-} 9.6%) of cases. Furthermore, BSCM identified distinct, patient-specific symptom-motility associations during the meal response. BSCM accurately detects meal- and stimulant-induced increases in colonic motility with high fidelity to invasive HRM. As a non-invasive method that is easy to apply with minimal resource and time requirements, BSCM is well-positioned for clinical translation as a scalable diagnostic tool to elucidate symptom-motility associations and guide personalized management in refractory chronic constipation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.5%
2
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
3
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
7
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%