Back

Did State-level telehealth policies in 2020 Reduce Urban-rural Disparity in Care Utilization? A Multilevel Analysis

Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Hayes, C. J.; Bogulski, C. A.; Winston, K.; Tahara, D.; Eswaran, H.

2026-02-10 health policy
10.64898/2026.02.08.26345818 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionWe aim to examine whether state-level telehealth policies in 2020 were associated with a reduction in the urban-rural disparity in telehealth utilization. MethodA multilevel model was used to assess state actions impact on urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization. We used the percentage of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries receiving any telehealth services (measured by county level) in 2020 as the dependent variable. We examined the following state-level policies as key independent variables at the state level: 1) telehealth coverage parity requirement for payers; 2) recognizing a call from patients address as the originating site of telehealth visit; 3) mandating the coverage of audio-only telehealth visits. ResultsBoth mandating the coverage of audio-only visits and telehealth coverage parity requirement were significantly associated with higher level of telehealth utilization. For audio-only reimbursement mandate and telehealth coverage parity requirement, the interaction between the state policy and the countys rurality was associated with a significant increase in telehealth utilization rate, whereas the interaction between the states waiver for the requirement of originating site and the countys rurality was negatively associated with telehealth utilization rate. ConclusionThe audio-only telecare reimbursement mandate and telehealth payment parity could help close the urban-rural gap in telehealth utilization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
37.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.1%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%