Back

Expanding CyanoHAB Monitoring: New Micropeptins and Generalizable MS/MS Workflows for the Annotation of Cyanopeptide Classes

Xia, R.; Ahn, L.; Burkhauser, M.; Youngs, R.; Bertin, M. J.

2026-02-09 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.07.704577 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) are a major ecological and public health concern, commonly monitored for hepatotoxic microcystins and cylindrospermopsins and neurotoxic anatoxins and saxitoxins. However, the broader suite of bioactive metabolites produced during blooms remains under characterized. Here, we interrogated a chromatography fraction library generated from a cyanoHAB in Muskegon, Michigan. From this library, we isolated two new micropeptins (1 and 2), including an analog bearing a bishomologated tyrosine residue, and we confirmed the structure of ferintoic acid C (3). Structures were established using complementary spectrometric and spectroscopic methods. To expand chemical space coverage beyond isolated compounds, we analyzed LC-MS/MS data using the GNPS2 Analysis Hub query language for product ion searching, enabling annotation of cyanopeptide classes and class-specific modifications across the fraction set, which provided a practical and user-friendly approach for identifying cyanopeptide classes. One of the new micropeptins (1) exhibited moderate inhibition of neutrophil elastase, consistent with roles in ecological interactions and potential relevance to human exposure. Analysis of field samples from ongoing Lake Erie blooms showed recurring micropeptins but no evidence of microcystins. Together, these results challenge microcystin-centric assessments of bloom hazard and support expanded monitoring of non-microcystin cyanopeptides. SYNOPSISRoutine cyanoHAB monitoring targets few regulated toxins; we reveal abundant, under characterized cyanopeptides and enable rapid class-level annotation across datasets with a new LC-MS/MS analysis pipeline. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=114 SRC="FIGDIR/small/704577v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1849d1eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16729a8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dffe58org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b36a52_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
6
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
8
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
17
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
22
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
25
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
27
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
29
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%