Back

Montreal Urban Observatory: research platform to monitor urban forest ecosystems for global change adaptation and health

Paquette, A.; Sous-Silva, R.; Fernandez, M.; Faticov, M.; Schille, L.; Bacon, E. S.; Cameron, E.; Fraysse, J.; Gagnon Koudji, E.; Poirier, S.; Rondeau-Leclaire, J.; Tardif, S.; Handa, I. T.; Laforest-Lapointe, I.; Puric-Mladenovic, D.; Ziter, C. D.

2026-02-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.07.704556 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As urban populations grow, cities are increasingly seen not only as drivers of climate change but also as critical arenas for implementing mitigation and adaptation strategies. Urban forests and green infrastructure play a vital role in shaping environmental quality and human health, yet access to these benefits remains inequitable. The Montreal Urban Observatory was designed to investigate the complex relationships among biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human health. Twenty-five permanent plots were established across the Island of Montreal, strategically located along gradients in vegetation cover, population density, and mean household income. Interdisciplinary research within the Observatory focuses on themes including urban forest structure and function, abiotic conditions, biodiversity, ecological interactions, natures contributions to people, related human health outcomes, and developing novel methodological approaches. The Observatory supports long-term, cross-scale monitoring and fosters collaborative research on urban social-ecological systems, thus contributing to global initiatives to enhance urban sustainability and equity through nature-based solutions. Early results confirm the relevance of the main gradients for several organisms and response variables, from microbes to trees and abiotic factors. For example, sampling all trees, public and private, within a radius of 200m centered on each plot revealed significant differences in the diversity and structure of private and public trees, including an overwhelming dominance of Thuya occidentalis not captured in commonly used public tree inventories.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.7%
3
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
6
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
15
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%