Back

WAH-i: Optimising Microphone Array Geometry for Customised Localisation Accuracy

Umadi, R.

2026-02-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.07.704547 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAccurate spatial localisation of free-flying echolocating bats is foundational for resolving fine-scale flight behaviour, prey interception, and spatial decision-making in natural environments. Acoustic localisation using microphone arrays is widely employed for this purpose, yet array geometries in field studies are typically chosen heuristically rather than systematically optimised. As portable multichannel ultrasonic recording systems become increasingly accessible, principled design guidelines are needed to ensure reliable localisation performance under practical deployment requirements. C_LIO_LII introduce an iterative array optimisation algorithm that designs microphone geometries by maximising localisation reliability within a predefined three-dimensional field of interest. The method evaluates candidate geometries using simulated acoustic emissions and time-difference-of-arrival localisation, quantifying performance as a volumetric pass rate: the proportion of source locations that meet a user-defined accuracy threshold. Microphone positions are iteratively perturbed and accepted based on improvements to this task-level metric, while enforcing practical constraints on array aperture, inter-sensor spacing, and deployability. C_LIO_LIAcross canonical polyhedral geometries, random initialisations, and arrays comprising four to twelve microphones, optimisation consistently produced rapid early gains followed by convergence to geometry-specific performance limits. Under fixed-aperture constraints, increasing the microphone count yielded diminishing returns, and optimised low-order arrays -- particularly four-microphone configurations -- matched or exceeded the volumetric localisation performance of higher-order arrays with suboptimal geometry. Analysis of optimisation trajectories further revealed that convergence dynamics scale with array order, whereas achievable volumetric performance is dominated by geometry rather than sensor number. C_LIO_LIThese results demonstrate that array geometry is the primary determinant of volumetric localisation reliability, and that efficient, portable arrays can be systematically designed using optimisation rather than heuristic rules. The proposed framework is broadly applicable to bioacoustic localisation problems beyond echolocating bats, including avian tracking, passive acoustic monitoring, and conservation-oriented sensing, and provides a general approach for designing task-optimised acoustic sensor arrays for a wide range of applications. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
8
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
9
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
12
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
13
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
24
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%