Back

Antimicrobial Combination Effects at Subinhibitory Doses do not Reliably Predict Effects at Inhibitory Concentrations

Muetter, M.; Angst, D. C.; Regoes, R. R.; Bonhoeffer, S.

2026-02-08 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.07.703730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Assessing whether drug combinations synergise or antagonise is difficult for several reasons: (i) measuring bacterial death rates at clinically relevant drug concentrations is methodologically challenging, (ii) there is no unifying definition of what constitutes synergistic or antagonistic interactions, and (iii) both synergism and antagonism may be concentration and mixing ratio dependent. To assess how well sub-inhibitory measurements predict inhibitory behaviour, we quantified drug interactions for 15 pairwise drug combinations on a concentration checker-board covering a wide range of inhibitory and sub-inhibitory concentrations. To this end, we recorded 8640 time-resolved luminescence trajectories that have been shown to track bacterial population declines. To handle time-varying treatment effects and allow fair comparisons between drugs with distinct killing dynamics, we introduced a growth-integrated rate-like metric{psi} to summarise each trajectory, and assigned interaction types (synergistic/independent/antagonistic) based on Bliss independence and Loewe additivity. We found that the interaction type frequently changes as the concentration increases from sub-inhibitory to inhibitory concentrations. Moreover, interaction type depended on the mixing ratio, implying that single-point sub-inhibitory measurements are not sufficient to predict interactions at clinically relevant concentrations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.