Back

National Trends in Dentalcare Utilization, 2018-2021: Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Factors Associated with Care

Zanwar, P. P.; Zare, H.; Mathur, K.; Slashcheva, L.; Wu, B.

2026-02-09 health economics
10.64898/2026.02.07.26345812 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAge-group specific disparities for dentalcare use persist in the United States. The COVID-19 led to delays in non-urgent dentalcare. We provide national estimates on dentalcare use and influencing factors for the U.S. population before and during the COVID-19. MethodsWe used nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for over pre-COVID-19 years (2018-2019) and COVID-19 years (2020-2021) We estimated yearly survey-weighted trends in mean non-zero dental visits by age followed Poisson regression, controlling for a comprehensive set of confounders across five domains of influence. Dentalcare visits were defined as visits to any dentalcare provider. ResultsOverall analytic sample included non-institutionalized community living persons (unweighted n=6518, weighted N[~]320 million) grouped as ages 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, 65-74 and 75+ present in all four years The prevalence ratio (PR) for dental visits was slightly higher for ages 75+ in comparison to ages 65-74 across years 2018-2021 and increased from 1.73 (95% CI: 1.4, 2.1) to 1.84 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.3) to 2.13 (95% CI: 1.7, 2.7) from 2018 to 2020 but rebounding to near pre-pandemic level in 2021 to 1.66 (95% CI, 1.3, 2.0). Consistent factors during COVID-19 pandemic years 2020-2021 that increased dental visits included dental insurance, high income, and having a usual source of care (p<0.01). ConclusionsDentalcare use rebounded for older adults in 2021 but remained below pre-pandemic levels. Practical ImplicationsIncreasing dentalcare visits across ages remains a key policy priority. Continued monitoring of dentalcare use trends beyond COVID-19 among older adults is critical to improve their oral health.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.3%
2
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
8
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
20
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%