Back

Unwinding of an RNA duplex by the Orthoflavivirus NS3 helicase requires translocation beyond the displaced strand and is stimulated by the NS5 RdRp

Arnold, J. J.; Chib, S.; Cameron, C. E.

2026-02-07 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.06.704446 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The NS3 helicases from the Flaviviridae family of viruses exhibit nucleotide-hydrolysis-dependent, nucleic-acid-unwinding activity. The RNA unwinding activity for NS3 helicases from the Orthoflavivirus genus has not been fully explored and contrasts with NS3 helicase from Hepatitis C virus (HCV) of the Hepacivirus genus, which has thus far served as the prototypical model enzyme from this family of viruses. To begin to understand the functional differences between flavivirus NS3 helicases, we first developed an expression and purification system for full-length untagged NS3 protein from West Nile virus (WNV) and Zika virus (ZIKV). Both enzymes exhibit RNA-stimulated ATPase activity and are dependent on the nucleoside triphosphatase active site of the enzyme. Unlike HCV NS3, orthoflavivirus NS3s do not efficiently pre-assemble on a 3-ssRNA-tailed dsRNA substrate in the absence of ATP-Mg which is a prerequisite for formation of a productive HCV NS3-RNA complex that can exhibit a rapid burst of RNA unwinding. Instead, to observe RNA unwinding by WNV and ZIKV NS3s, low Mg-ATP concentrations are required at a time coincident when NS3 encounters the RNA substrate. In addition, we find that orthoflavivirus NS3s require translocation beyond the displaced strand to completely unwind a dsRNA substrate. Last, we find that orthoflavivirus NS5 stimulates the ability of NS3 to unwind dsRNA. These results suggest that functional differences exist between the flavivirus NS3 helicases and illuminate that orthoflavivirus NS3s require a functional interaction with the NS5 protein for coordination of its activity, as it is believed these two proteins constitute the viral replicase.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.7%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.2%
4
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
8
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
14
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Antiviral Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%