Balancing Stability and Flow in Hippocampal Networks via Inductive Bias and Learned Symmetry Breaking
Wagner, M.; Chen, Y.; Karuvally, A.; Cameron, M.; Sejnowski, T. J.
Show abstract
The hippocampus must balance stable memory representations with internally generated sequential dynamics underlying replay, prediction and traveling waves. How hippocampal circuitry achieves both remains unclear. Here, we show that recurrent neural networks trained on continuous prediction tasks converge to a mixed-symmetry dynamical regime, in which dominant symmetric recurrence stabilizes a continuous attractor while a weaker antisymmetric component induces directed flow along it. This structure accelerates learning and supports robust replay and prediction. We further show that such symmetry breaking can arise from biologically plausible spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rules, yielding a tilted Mexican-hat connectivity profile without explicit architectural constraints. Importantly, initializing networks with CA3-like structured connectivity biases learning toward this regime, improving optimization efficiency and performance. These results suggest that hippocampal computation reflects an interaction between biologically constrained circuit structure and task-driven learning, with partial symmetry breaking providing a low-dimensional control principle for balancing stability and flow in sequence generation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Latent Representations in Hippocampal Network Model Co-Evolve with Behavioral Exploration of Task Structure 96%
- Two roles for choice selective inhibition in decision-making circuits 96%
- Theory of spontaneous persistent activity and inactivity in vivo reveals differential cortico-entorhinal functional connectivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.